Files
G4G0-2/AI & Data Mining/Week 22/Chapter 22 Validity and Inference Rules.md
2025-03-16 18:59:42 +00:00

2.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

  1. A syllogism is an instance of a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn from two given or assumed propositions; a common or middle term is present in the two premises but not in the conclusion, which may be invalid.
  2. Aristotle

Double Negation ¬ Elim ¬ ¬ p p

Propositions Premises Conclusion
p \neg\neg p p
T T T
F F F

Hypothetical syllogism; this says that if p implies q and q implies r, then it can be logically concluded that p implies r. p ⇒ q q ⇒ r p ⇒ r

Propositions Premises Conclusion
p q r p \implies q q \implies r p \implies r
T T T T T T
T T F T F
T F T F T
T F F F T
F T T T T T
F T F T F
F F T T T T
F F F T T T
  1. Involves linking implications together in a sequential manner, much like the links in a chain.

p q q Therefore, p

Propositions Premises Conclusion
p q p \lor q q p
T T T T T
T F T F T
F T T T F
F F F F F

p ⇒ q q ⇒ p Therefore, p ∧ q

Propositions Premises Conclusion
p q p \implies q q \implies p p \land q
T T T T T
T F F T F
F T T F F
F F T T F

p \implies q r \implies s p \lor r (p disjunction (or) r) Conclusion: q \lor s

The "Constructive Dilemma": If the disjunction of the antecedent of two implications holds then the disjunction of the conclusions also must hold